GRPC

REST vs gRPC: The Pragmatic, Developer-Friendly Guide TL;DR REST is universal, human-friendly, cacheable, and ideal for public APIs and browser clients. It uses HTTP semantics with resource-oriented design and JSON by default. gRPC is fast, strongly typed, and streaming-friendly—great for internal microservices and low-latency mobile/IoT. It uses HTTP/2 (or HTTP/3 in some stacks) and Protocol Buffers (Protobuf). Use REST for broad reach, compatibility, and simple CRUD; use gRPC for high-throughput, low-latency, streaming, or strongly typed interfaces across polyglot services. Hybrid patterns—REST for public, gRPC internally—often deliver the best of both worlds. Contents ...

REST vs. gRPC: Understanding the Differences and Choosing the Right Protocol As the landscape of application development continues to evolve, so too do the communication protocols that software developers rely upon. Two primary contenders in the realm of remote procedure call (RPC) architectures today are REST (Representational State Transfer) and gRPC (Google Remote Procedure Call). Both are powerful in their right and cater to different use cases based on project requirements. This article delves into the core differences between REST and gRPC, examining their strengths, weaknesses, and when to use each. ...